United Nations Archives

Bill Gates (Think Moderna) and U.N. Report: VACCINE-INDUCED POLIO

December 14, 2020 JB

By JB News Target 9-8-2020 Excerpts: “United Nations forced to admit that vaccines from Bill Gates are spreading polio throughout Africa.” “… World Health Organization (WHO) …polio vaccines from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are spreading more polio throughout Africa. Not only that, but these “relief” jabs are killing young black lives in places like Chad and Sudan where outbreaks of the vaccine-induced disease are spreading like wildfire. “There is local circulation in Sudan and continued sharing of transmission with Chad.” “This is why Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s law firm has filed a lawsuit against Gates for crimes against humanity…” United Nations forced to admit that vaccines from Bill Gates are spreading polio throughout Africa NewsTarget Uncensored and Independent Media News 09/08/2020 / By Ethan Huff / Comments A new report by the World Health Organization (WHO), a branch of the United Nations (UN), confirms everything we have long been saying about the deadly nature of Bill Gates’ vaccination programs in the Third World. Entitled, “Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 – Sudan,” the report outlines how polio vaccines from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are spreading more polio throughout Africa. Not only that, but these “relief” jabs are killing young black lives in places like Chad and Sudan where outbreaks of the vaccine-induced disease are spreading like wildfire. Amazingly, the WHO openly admits that the strain of poliovirus currently circulating, known as cVDPV2, is “vaccine-derived.” This clearly indicates that it is being spread by the very same vaccines that Bill Gates claims are helping to “save lives” and “eradicate polio.” “Sequencing of viruses isolated in Sudan so far reflects that the viruses are related with viruses reported earlier in neighboring Chad from where there were multiple separate introductions into Sudan from Chad,” the report explains. “There is (Continue Reading)

QUOTES of NOTE ~ May 2019

May 20, 2019 Ronnie Herne

AMERICAN Sovereignty – “This is why Americans reject the idea of a sovereign United Nations that presumes to be the source of legitimacy for the United States Government’s policies, foreign or domestic. There is only one source of legitimacy of the American government’s policies – and that is the consent of the American people.” Sen Jesse Helms, 1-20-2000 in a speech to the UN Security Council. Government Power “Government power must be dispersed. If government is to exercise power, better in the county than in the state, better in the state than in Washington. …If I do not like what my local community does, I can move to another local community… If I do not like what my state does, I can move to another. [But] if I do not like what Washington imposes, I have few alternatives in this world of jealous nations.” Milton Friedman, economist, in his 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom. Are Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar Jihadis in Congress? … “The jihadist concept of al wala al barra …stipulates that a Muslim owes no allegiance to, and must not obey the laws of, any political system that is not run by Muslims, and that such un-Islamic systems must be destroyed.” Sebastian Gorka’s 2018 book Why We Fight. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

FYI: UNITED NATIONS Miscellaneous

December 17, 2018 JB

Michael New Action Fund Internet Edition December 15, 2018 SPC4 Michael New patriotically joined the US Army in the early 1990s and was subsequently court-martialed under Clinton for refusing to join the UN Army. Michael New >>>>>> The New American 12-12-18 exposes the hypocrisy of “dignitaries” from around the world who fly in on private jets and ride in limos as they lecture others to use less energy and resources. https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/env >>>>>> Item #10 in the UN agenda at the 1976 Habitat 1: “Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; …. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable….” >>>>>> JB

They Want US To Be A Subservient ‘Nation State’

October 13, 2018 JB

[caption id="attachment_1488" align="aligncenter" width="617"]

UN Planning Meeting[/caption]

The United Nations was established October 24, 1945 by a war-torn weary world. Their purpose was to be establishing a world of peace through mutual agreements. To create the simple goal they started with, they have created many many thousands of pages of rules, regulations, treaties, agreements, etc. which would govern every possible aspect of our lives: ie, education, transportation, immigration, finance, manufacturing, justice ….

(Continue Reading)

CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD 1990

August 22, 2018 Ronnie Herne

OHCHR

Convention on the Rights of the Child

Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989
entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49

Preamble

The States Parties to the present Convention,

Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Bearing in mind that the peoples of the United Nations have, in the Charter, reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights and in the dignity and worth of the human person, and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Recognizing that the United Nations has, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenants on Human Rights, proclaimed and agreed that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status,

Recalling that, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations has proclaimed that childhood is entitled to special care and assistance,

Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and particularly children, should be afforded the necessary protection and assistance so that it can fully assume its responsibilities within the community,

Recognizing that the child, for the full and harmonious development of his or her personality, should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding,

Considering that the child should be fully prepared to live an individual life in society, and brought up in the spirit of the ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, and in particular in the spirit of peace, dignity, tolerance, freedom, equality and solidarity,

(Continue Reading)

THEY PROTECT US – WHO PROTECTS THEM?

July 29, 2018 Daniel New

They Protect Us – Who Protects Them?

The politicians of our nation have so messed this country up, but the military is still our military. Or is it? Why do our Armed Forces exist? To protect the United States of America? One would think so. But there are politicians in both parties who think our soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen are there for something else – to carry out the agenda of the United Nations!

What’s wrong with that? Where does one start? First and foremost, the problem is that if we allow even a portion of our military to be controlled by any foreign power, then to that precise extent, we are no longer sovereign and we are that vulnerable to attack from any quarter, in any way, when our defenses are compromised.

Second, and as important, the U.N. is not the U.S. We did not elect them, we cannot impeach them, and yet we have to support them with our tax dollars. If we let them take even a smidgeon of control over our military, then they will eventually own us. Not acceptable. Why should we allow ourselves to be governed by a motley crew of socialists, petty dictators and greedy welfare nations who want nothing more than to (continue to) plunder the American taxpayer?

Well, then, why should they have any control over our military and its actions? Only a nation bent upon national suicide would allow another power to control their military forces. Is that what the politicians want? You think it through – that’s what they are asking for when they push for military alliances which are outside the scope of the Constitution, when presidents involve us in war-making without congressional approval, etc.

Does America have no will to survive? If we continue in this direction, then we shall not survive as a sovereign nation. The Citizen Soldier Protection Act of 2015 is a modest little stumbling block on the road to a New World Order. It will check the ability of renegade politicians who attempt to turn our troops into mercenaries, against their will. It will prevent the forced military service under the United Nations (or other international agencies) without the permission of the soldier. It won’t prevent volunteers from going on those missions – we seem to always have enough people who are looking for action and adventure and glory, but the very idea, that you can force an American citizen-soldier to serve under a foreign power, not only constitutes Involuntary Servitude, but it borders on Treason!
(Continue Reading)

U.N. U.S. and MICHAEL NEW

July 10, 2018 Daniel New

QUESTION

What happened to an American decorated soldier who refused to remove his U.S. uniform, don the UN uniform/insignias, and serve under a foreign country’s commander??

TWENTY YEARS SINCE NEW’S HISTORIC STAND
By Daniel New March 10, 2015

Twenty years ago this year, a young soldier in the US Army, stationed in Germany, was given an unlawful order to wear an unauthorized United Nations uniform, to report to duty to a foreign military officer, and to deploy to Macedonia on a “peacekeeping mission” where he stood a good chance of having to fight, bleed or die for the United Nations. He respectfully declined the “honor”, stating to his officers that he did not take an oath to the United Nations, that he was a soldier in the U.S. Army, and that he had no contract with the United Nations. Without judgment on those who chose to volunteer, Army SPC4 Michael New requested a transfer to any other unit, anywhere in the world, in a US Army uniform under US Army officers. A free citizen cannot be forced to serve a foreign power.

SPC New was told he had to obey orders without question. To make a long story short, on October 10, 1995, he deliberately disobeyed the order, showing up in formation wearing an authorized Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) with a US flag on his right shoulder instead of the UN patch worn by the other 549 soldiers. He was promptly arrested and removed from formation, and consequently court-martialed. In the court-martial that followed, SPC New was prepared to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that:

1. The order to deploy was illegal, for President Clinton lied to Congress about the legal basis of the order;
2. The uniform was unauthorized according to Army regulations governing what constitutes a Battle Dress Uniform;
3. The Constitution specifically forbids American troops from receiving an income (or “emoliument”) from any other government;
4. The chain of command was unconstitutional, with a general from Finland in charge of U.S. troops in a situation where Congress had not authorized it.

(Continue Reading)